What Real, Healthy Love Looks Like (and What It’s Not)
- Co & Associates

- 6 days ago
- 5 min read
We’re sold a lot of fantasy love: effortless, consuming, “meant to be,” never messy. But healthy love is rooted in reality—in two full humans building something soft and safe, contained and honest, passionate and grounded.
Healthy love isn’t perfect. It’s consistent, reciprocal, and repairable. It can hold conflict without collapsing into chaos, control, or disconnection.
Below is a Co & Associates guide to what healthy love is—and what it isn’t—using research-backed relationship principles and trusted clinical frameworks.
Healthy love feels safe because it’s structured
“Safe” doesn’t mean “never challenged.” It means the relationship has enough emotional structure that hard moments don’t become threatening moments.
1) Boundaries exist—and they’re respected
Healthy love has clear relational edges: what’s okay, what’s not, what each person needs to stay well.
Boundaries aren’t punishments. They’re the conditions that allow closeness to be sustainable. The Gottman Institute describes boundaries as the limits/rules in relationships that support feeling respected, safe, and fulfilled.
Healthy boundaries sound like:
“I’m available to talk tonight, but I need 20 minutes to decompress first.”
“I love you, and I’m not okay with yelling. Let’s pause and come back.”
“We can disagree—and still be on the same team.”
2) Connection is built in small moments, not grand gestures
One of the most evidence-based predictors of relationship stability is how partners respond to everyday “bids” for connection—small attempts for attention, affection, or shared reality.
The Gottman Institute describes bids as attempts to connect, and “turning toward” those bids builds trust and closeness over time.
Healthy love looks like:
You don’t have to perform to be noticed.
Small bids aren’t ignored, mocked, or punished.
There’s a steady rhythm of “I’m here” in daily life.
3) It’s emotionally generous during conflict
Conflict is inevitable. The difference isn’t whether you fight—it’s how you fight and how you repair.
Gottman research highlights the importance of repair attempts—the small moves people make to de-escalate, reconnect, and return to safety (humor, softening, accountability, “can we start over?”). Consistently failed repairs predict an unhappy relational future.
And thriving couples maintain a stronger balance of positive-to-negative interactions during conflict: the well-known 5:1 ratio (five or more positive interactions for every negative one).
Healthy love means:
You can be direct without being cruel.
You can confront without threatening the relationship.
You can take accountability without collapsing into shame.
4) It’s honest, even when it’s uncomfortable
Healthy love doesn’t rely on mind-reading, games, tests, or ambiguity. It values clarity.
That often means naming the hard things:
resentment
differences in needs
fear
boundaries
trust ruptures
Not to “win”—but to stay real.
5) It includes repair as a normal part of intimacy
Every relationship cycles through connection → disconnection → reconnection. Esther Perel emphasizes that this cycle exists in every relationship and invites couples to slow down and work together to identify what’s really happening underneath conflict.
In healthy love, repair isn’t rare. It’s a relationship skill, practiced early and often.
Repair can look like:
“I got defensive. I’m sorry. I want to understand.”
“That landed harsh. Let me try again.”
“I don’t agree, but I’m still with you.”
6) It’s reciprocal and “we-protective”
Healthy love isn’t one person carrying the emotional and relational load.
In the PACT (Psychobiological Approach to Couples Therapy) model, Stan Tatkin describes secure-functioning relationships as built on mutuality, collaboration, fairness, and protecting the relationship’s safety and security.
Healthy love includes:
mutual care (not one-sided caretaking)
shared responsibility for rupture and repair
decisions that consider both partners
“we” thinking without losing “me”
What healthy love is not
Sometimes the clearest way to recognize healthy love is to name what it’s not—especially if you’ve learned to confuse intensity with intimacy.
1) It’s not enmeshment
Enmeshment involves overly blurred boundaries—where two people become excessively involved in each other’s lives and autonomy shrinks.
The APA defines enmeshment as a condition where people (often family members) are involved in each other’s activities and personal relationships to an excessive degree.
Signs it’s enmeshment (not closeness):
guilt when you prioritize your own needs
pressure to share everything or be “one person”
jealousy/control framed as love
your nervous system feels policed, not protected
Healthy love supports togetherness and individuality.
2) It’s not codependency
Codependency is often a pattern where a relationship becomes organized around one person’s dysfunction or needs, with the other becoming psychologically dependent on (or controlled by) that dynamic.
The APA notes codependency can refer to mutual emotional reliance, and also to a dysfunctional pattern where someone is psychologically dependent on (or controlled by) a person with a disorder (e.g., substance use or gambling).
Signs it’s codependency:
you feel responsible for their emotions, choices, or stability
you abandon your needs to keep the peace
you fear honesty because it might “set them off”
you confuse being needed with being loved
Healthy love is supportive, not self-erasing.
3) It’s not a trauma bond
A trauma bond is not “bonding over shared trauma.” It’s an attachment that forms in the cycle of abuse—where harm and affection become intertwined.
Cleveland Clinic describes trauma bonding as a phenomenon that reinforces the cycle of abuse and creates complicated attachments to an abuser/perpetrator.
Signs it’s a trauma bond:
intensity + instability (high highs, devastating lows)
cycles of harm → apology → hope → harm
you feel addicted to the relief after pain
fear replaces safety, but you call it love
Healthy love doesn’t require you to bleed to belong.
4) It’s not pedestal love
Real love is not worship. It doesn’t place one partner above the other while the other shrinks.
Healthy love = two whole people who matter equally.
5) It’s not “no conflict”
Avoiding conflict isn’t the goal. Healthy love can handle conflict without contempt, character attacks, or emotional abandonment.
Gottman’s “Four Horsemen”—criticism, contempt, defensiveness, and stonewalling—are key patterns that corrode connection. Recognizing and replacing them matters.
A quick “reality check” list: Healthy love feels like…
Safe: You can be imperfect without being punished.
Soft: There’s tenderness even when things are hard.
Contained: Conflict has edges; it doesn’t become scorched-earth.
Consistent: Care is reliable, not sporadic.
Honest: Clarity is valued over guessing games.
Reciprocal: Both people give, both people receive.
Repairable: Rupture doesn’t equal doom—repair is expected and practiced.
Connected in small ways: Bids are noticed; turning toward is normal.
Mutual and “we-protective”: The relationship is protected through fairness and collaboration.
If this brings up questions for you…
If you’re realizing you’ve been in a relationship dynamic that felt intense but unsafe—or you’re in a good relationship and want better tools for conflict and repair—couples therapy can help.
At Co & Associates, we support individuals and couples in building:
stronger boundaries
emotional safety
secure attachment patterns
healthier conflict + real repair
Written by: Garion Sparks-Austin Registered Social Worker, Psychotherapist Founder & Director of Co & Associates

Disclaimer:
The information provided in this blog is for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended to replace professional mental health assessment, diagnosis, or treatment. Reading this content does not establish a therapist–client relationship with Co & Associates or any of its clinicians.
Relationships are complex, and each individual and couple’s experiences are unique. If you are experiencing ongoing distress, relationship conflict, emotional harm, or concerns about safety, we encourage you to seek support from a qualified mental health professional. If you are in immediate danger, please contact local emergency services.
References & Further Reading
Gottman Institute. (n.d.). The truth about boundaries.https://www.gottman.com/blog/the-truth-about-boundaries/
Gottman Institute. (n.d.). Turn toward instead of away.https://www.gottman.com/blog/turn-toward-instead-of-away/
Gottman Institute. (n.d.). R is for repair.https://www.gottman.com/blog/r-is-for-repair/
Gottman Institute. (n.d.). The magic relationship ratio, according to science.https://www.gottman.com/blog/the-magic-relationship-ratio-according-science/
Gottman Institute. (n.d.). The Four Horsemen: Criticism, contempt, defensiveness, and stonewalling.https://www.gottman.com/blog/the-four-horsemen-recognizing-criticism-contempt-defensiveness-and-stonewalling/
American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Enmeshment. APA Dictionary of Psychology.https://dictionary.apa.org/enmeshment
American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Codependency. APA Dictionary of Psychology.https://dictionary.apa.org/codependency
Cleveland Clinic. (n.d.). Trauma bonding: Why people form attachments to abusive partners.https://health.clevelandclinic.org/trauma-bonding
Perel, E. (n.d.). Conflict and repair in intimate relationships.https://www.estherperel.com/topics/conflict
Tatkin, S. (n.d.). The ten commandments for a secure-functioning relationship. The PACT Institute.https://www.thepactinstitute.com/blog/the-ten-commandments-for-a-secure-functioning-relationship







Comments